AI Ranked
Guide

Profound alternatives: 8 AI visibility tools and when each beats Profound

Profound is the category leader for big brands, and for many teams it is more platform, and less price transparency, than they need. Here is what it does well and where each alternative wins.

Short answerThe best Profound alternatives are Peec AI (from $95 a month, the best all-round value), Scrunch (from $300, the closest engine coverage), AthenaHQ (free tier, 11 models on Starter), Ahrefs Brand Radar and Semrush (if you already use them), and ZeroRank, Otterly.AI or HubSpot AEO for small budgets. Profound remains the stronger pick for large enterprises.
Key takeaways
  • Profound raised a $96 million Series C at a $1 billion valuation in February 2026 and says it supports more than 700 enterprises.
  • Profound's pricing page shows a free 7-day trial (50 fixed prompts, 3 engines) and custom Enterprise pricing, with no published dollar figures for paid plans.
  • Every alternative here publishes a price: from $29 a month (Otterly.AI) to $300 a month (Scrunch Starter), plus free tiers from AthenaHQ and HubSpot AEO.
  • Profound Enterprise tracks up to 9 engines; ZeroRank lists up to 17 platforms and AthenaHQ Starter 11 models.
  • The usual reasons to switch are budget, a need to test with your own prompts before a contract, and agency multi-client setups.

What is Profound, and who is it for?

Profound is an AI visibility and AI marketing platform that tracks how answer engines describe, cite and recommend brands, then helps teams act on it. It is built for enterprise marketing teams. In February 2026 it raised a $96 million Series C led by Lightspeed Venture Partners at a $1 billion valuation, taking total funding past $155 million, and it says it serves more than 10 percent of the Fortune 500 and more than 700 enterprises, naming Target, Figma, Walmart, Ramp, MongoDB, Chime and U.S. Bank2 (Profound).

The platform has grown well past prompt tracking. Its site lists Answer Engine Insights, Prompt Volumes (built from what it describes as billions of real conversations), Agent Analytics for how AI bots crawl, cite and refer to your pages, FactCheck for misinformation about your brand, SKU-level Shopping data, and Profound Agents, which run marketing tasks on its data3 (Profound).

What does Profound cost?

Profound does not publish paid prices. Its pricing page lists three options1:

PlanPriceWhat you get
TrialFree50 prompts chosen by Profound, run daily for 7 days, on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews; 1 region, 1 language; no exports, API or data history
Agency GrowthNot publishedSelf-serve, 400 credits a month per client workspace
EnterpriseCustomCustom prompt plan run daily on up to 9 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude, AI Overviews, Exa Search); all-time history; CSV, JSON and API; SSO/SAML and SOC 2; unlimited seats

Profound review: where it is strong

Profound's edge is breadth plus paperwork. Few tools combine bot analytics, shopping placement, prompt-volume estimates and agents in one contract, and fewer have the compliance paperwork (SSO, SOC 2) that a large procurement team will ask for. Profound also publishes useful research; its study of 680 million citations is one we cite in our GEO guide. If you are a multi-brand enterprise with a team to act on the output, it belongs on the shortlist.

Why do teams look for Profound alternatives?

Teams usually look elsewhere because Profound won't give a paid price without a sales call, its trial runs prompts it picked instead of yours, and its platform is bigger than a tracking job needs. Agencies add a fourth reason. Each one points to a different alternative.

  • You need a price before a sales call. Every alternative below publishes at least one price.
  • You want to test your own prompts. Profound's trial uses prompts it picks and cannot be edited, so you cannot see your real buyer questions until you sign.
  • You are an agency with many small clients and need per-client economics and white-label reporting.
  • You only need tracking. If agents, shopping data and bot analytics will go unused, you are paying for a platform when a tracker would do.

How do the alternatives compare with Profound?

Every alternative here publishes a price where Profound quotes, and two of them track more engines than Profound Enterprise's nine: AthenaHQ Starter lists 11 models and ZeroRank lists up to 17 platforms. Profound's Enterprise plan still bundles the extras large buyers ask for: SSO, SOC 2, all-time history and SKU-level shopping data.

ToolEntry priceEnginesBeats Profound whenProfound still wins on
ProfoundCustomUp to 9 (Enterprise)(baseline)(baseline)
Peec AI$95/mo, 50 prompts3 of 7 per plan; up to 13 on EnterpriseYou want published pricing, unlimited users and your own prompts from day oneEngine count per plan, shopping depth
Scrunch$300/mo or $250 annual, 350 prompts7, incl. Claude and MetaYou want broad engines on a self-serve plan, or you run SitecoreAgents, prompt-volume data
AthenaHQFree; Starter $295/mo5 free, 11 on StarterYou want to start free and track many modelsEnterprise analytics depth
Ahrefs Brand RadarAdd-on from $199/mo7You need category-wide benchmarks without writing promptsYour-prompt tracking, agents
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit$99/mo, 25 promptsChatGPT, AI Mode (prompt tracking)You live in Semrush and want prompt research next to keywordsEngines, prompt volume
ZeroRank$39/mo, 2,400 answersUp to 17You are an agency or need many engines cheaply, with white-labelCompliance, enterprise support
Otterly.AI$29/mo, 15 prompts4 included, 3 add-onsYou need a basic tracker this week on a small budgetAlmost everything beyond tracking
HubSpot AEO$50/mo, 25 promptsChatGPT, Gemini, PerplexityYou run HubSpot and want AI data next to CRM recordsGoogle AI Overviews and AI Mode coverage

The 8 Profound alternatives

Peec AI is the one most in-house teams should trial first; the other seven win in narrower situations, from agency portfolios (ZeroRank) to teams already paying for Ahrefs, Semrush or HubSpot.

1. Peec AI: the best all-round alternative

Peec AI is what most mid-market teams should compare Profound against. It publishes three self-serve plans, includes unlimited users and daily runs on every one, and its feature list covers source classification, gap analysis by URL, crawl insights from CDN logs, an ads library and AI shopping (not every feature is on every plan)4.

Pricing
Starter $95 a month (50 prompts), Pro $245 (150), Advanced $495 (350, multi-country, Looker Studio), Enterprise custom (Peec AI pricing).
Engines
Choose 3 per plan from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity and Naver AI; Enterprise tracks up to 13.
Pick it over Profound if
You track one to five brands, want to load your own prompts from the first day, and need a number to put in a budget.
Stay with Profound if
You need more than three engines per brand without paying per extra model, or SKU-level shopping data at scale.

2. Scrunch: the closest match on coverage

Scrunch tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, and Meta on every plan, and adds its Agent Experience Platform (AXP), which serves an AI-friendly version of your site to AI agents5. Sitecore bought Scrunch in June 20266 (Sitecore).

Pricing
Starter $300 month to month or $250 a month annually (350 prompts, 3 personas, 3 users); Growth $500 or $417 annually (700 prompts); Enterprise custom with SSO and a data API (Scrunch pricing). 7-day trial, no card.
Pick it over Profound if
You want Claude and Meta tracked on a self-serve plan, persona-based prompts, and a 7-day trial on your own 350 prompts.
Stay with Profound if
You want independence from a CMS vendor, or you rely on Profound's agents and prompt-volume data.

3. AthenaHQ: the free starting point with the most models

AthenaHQ has the only permanent free tier among the enterprise-style platforms, and its paid Starter lists 11 models7. On Profound vs AthenaHQ, AthenaHQ wins on entry cost and model count (11 on Starter against Profound Enterprise's 9), while Profound's Enterprise plan lists SSO, SOC 2 and all-time history, the extras a large procurement team asks about first.

Pricing
Essential free (300 credits, 5 engines, $25 starting credit); Starter $295 a month (3,600 credits, 11 models); Enterprise custom. One credit is one AI response (AthenaHQ pricing).
Engines
Starter: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI and Mistral.
Pick it over Profound if
You want to try the workflow free, then track Grok, Meta AI or Mistral alongside the big engines.
Stay with Profound if
You need a published API on a mid-tier plan; AthenaHQ prices API access and extra credits through sales.

4. Ahrefs Brand Radar: the benchmark without the prompt list

Brand Radar shows any brand's AI visibility across a large prompt index that Ahrefs says is modeled from real searches, plus YouTube and Reddit mentions8 (Ahrefs).

Pricing
Brand Radar AI add-on from $199 a month; custom prompt packages from $50 a month for 2,500 checks, on top of an Ahrefs plan (Ahrefs pricing)9.
Engines
AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini and ChatGPT, with Claude listed on pricing.
Pick it over Profound if
You want to see which competitors AI already favors across a whole category in an afternoon, and you already pay for Ahrefs.
Stay with Profound if
Your decisions hinge on your own buyer prompts tracked daily; modeled index prompts will not match your buyers' wording.

5. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit: for Semrush shops

Profound vs Semrush is mostly a question of scope: Semrush's $99 toolkit tracks 25 prompts on ChatGPT and AI Mode, while Profound Enterprise runs a custom prompt plan daily on up to nine engines. The toolkit adds an AI Visibility Score, competitor research, prompt research with volume and difficulty, brand sentiment and narratives, daily prompt tracking and an AI search site audit10.

Pricing
$99 a month with 25 prompts; 50 extra prompts for $60 a month; no free trial (Semrush).
Engines
Semrush's help page names ChatGPT and Google AI Mode for prompt tracking.
Pick it over Profound if
You want AI prompt research beside keyword research, at a fixed low price.
Stay with Profound if
You track more than a few dozen prompts or need Perplexity, Claude and Copilot runs.

6. ZeroRank: the budget pick for agencies

ZeroRank prices on AI answers and lets you spend them across up to 17 platforms, with unlimited prompts, seats and countries, white-label dashboards, an MCP server and a REST API on every plan11.

Pricing
Starter $39 a month (2,400 answers, 1 workspace), Growth $199 (13,500, 10 workspaces), Agency $499 (31,500, unlimited workspaces), Enterprise custom (ZeroRank pricing).
Pick it over Profound if
You run AI visibility for many clients and need per-client dashboards without enterprise contracts.
Stay with Profound if
You need SOC 2 paperwork and a dedicated enterprise team, or volumes above 31,500 answers without custom terms.

7. Otterly.AI: the cheapest way to start tracking

Otterly.AI covers brand monitoring, citations, prompt research, a content audit with crawlability checks, and a public API12.

Pricing
Lite $29 a month (15 prompts), Standard $189 (100), Premium $489 (400), Enterprise from 1,000 prompts (Otterly.AI pricing).
Engines
ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot included; Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are add-ons ($59, $59 and $109 a month on Standard).
Pick it over Profound if
You are a small team that needs a baseline now and will decide on a platform later.
Stay with Profound if
You need all major engines; Otterly.AI Standard with every add-on costs $416 a month, and the reporting stays lighter.

8. HubSpot AEO: for HubSpot customers

HubSpot AEO tracks brand visibility, sentiment, competitor share of voice and citations, with prioritized recommendations, inside HubSpot13.

Pricing
$50 a month, or $45 paid annually, for 25 prompts; free tracking of 25 prompts with no card (HubSpot).
Engines
ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.
Pick it over Profound if
Your marketing runs on HubSpot and you want AI visibility next to the contacts and deals it may influence.
Stay with Profound if
Google AI Overviews, AI Mode or Claude matter to your buyers; HubSpot AEO does not track them.

Which Profound alternative should you pick?

Pick Peec AI if you're an in-house team with $100 to $500 a month, ZeroRank if you run many clients, and the Ahrefs or Semrush add-on if you already pay for that suite. The full breakdown by situation:

  • Budget under $100 a month, one brand: Otterly.AI Lite, ZeroRank Starter or HubSpot AEO. Run your 15 to 25 most commercial prompts.
  • In-house team, $100 to $500 a month: Peec AI. Choose Scrunch if Claude and Meta must be tracked from day one.
  • Agency with 5 or more clients: ZeroRank Growth or Agency, or Peec AI agency bundles. Profound's Agency Growth plan is worth a quote if clients expect the Profound name.
  • Already on Ahrefs or Semrush: test the add-on for one month before buying anything new.
  • Enterprise with SSO, SOC 2, multiple brands: Profound, Scrunch Enterprise and Peec AI Enterprise. Ask all three for answer volumes, retention and API limits in writing.

Before you commit to any of them, check whether AI engines mention you at all. A quick run of the free Arobis AI visibility checker, one of the other free AI visibility checkers we compared, or 20 prompts by hand will tell you whether you need a tracker yet or need to fix visibility first. The method for building a prompt set that is worth tracking is in how to measure AI visibility.

Our takeProfound is the right buy when the tool is the program: a large brand team with the people to act on agents, shopping data and bot analytics. For everyone else, the decision is mostly about engines and prompt counts, and Peec AI or Scrunch cover that with a price you can see. Whatever you pick, judge it on citation rate and mention rate over many runs; AI answers vary so much from run to run that a single "rank" means little (a SparkToro and Gumshoe study found under a 1 in 100 chance of the same brand list twice14, Search Engine Journal).

Want the wider field, including SE Ranking and Rankscale? See the best AI visibility tools, with a full comparison table and a trial checklist.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Profound cost?

Profound's pricing page lists a free Trial (50 fixed prompts run daily for 7 days on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews), custom Enterprise pricing, and an Agency Growth plan with 400 credits per client workspace. It publishes no dollar amounts for paid plans, so you need a sales conversation to get a quote.

What is the best Profound alternative?

For most in-house teams, Peec AI: published prices from $95 a month, unlimited users, daily runs and a deep source-analysis feature set. Scrunch is the closest match on engine coverage at $300 a month. Teams already on Ahrefs or Semrush should test those add-ons first, and agencies on a budget should look at ZeroRank.

Is there a free alternative to Profound?

AthenaHQ has a free Essential tier with 300 credits across five engines, and HubSpot AEO offers free tracking of 25 prompts with no card. Profound itself has a free 7-day trial. For a one-off check, free checkers or running 20 prompts by hand in each assistant will show whether you are mentioned at all.

Which Profound alternative tracks the most AI engines?

ZeroRank lists up to 17 platforms on every plan, and AthenaHQ's $295 Starter plan lists 11 models including Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI and Mistral. Profound Enterprise covers up to 9. Scrunch covers 7 on its entry plan, including Claude and Meta. Remember that more engines multiply the answers you use.

Who should stay with Profound?

Large brands that need SSO, SOC 2, all-time data history, an API, SKU-level shopping data and bot analytics in one contract, and that have a team to act on the output. Profound says it supports more than 700 enterprises including Target, Walmart and Figma, so its process is built for that buyer.

Can I switch from Profound without losing my history?

Only if you export it. Profound's Enterprise plan includes CSV and JSON exports and API access, so pull your prompt list, daily results and cited URLs before the contract ends. Expect a break in trend lines anyway, because a new tool samples answers differently. Run both tools in parallel for two to four weeks if you can.

Sources

Cite this page AI Ranked Editorial. "Profound alternatives: 8 AI visibility tools and when each beats Profound." AI Ranked, October 11, 2026. https://airanked.ai/guides/profound-alternatives